Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Nat. Bank v. Rome Iron Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1900No. 1,086PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Equity. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

The Chattanooga National Bank, of Chattanooga, Tenn., brings its bill against the Borne Iron Company, a Georgia corporation, and Halstead Smith, as trustee in bankruptcy of the said Rome Iron Company. The facts stated in the bill are that on May 27, 1898, the iron company made and executed, for a valuable consideration, to the bank, its five promissory notes, each for the sum of $5,100 principal, dated at Chattanooga, Tenn., with legal interest from date, and attorney’s fees if collected by an attorney by suit or otherwise. To secure the same the iron company executed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Murray v. LylburnNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  5. Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  3. Burrowes v. NimocksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  4. Duplan Silk Co. v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  5. Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. DavyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API