Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Holbrook

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Cross motions for judgment on the pleadings after demurrers by certain defendants as stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Giegerich,

J. This action is brought by the trustee in bankruptcy of Holbrook & Schaefer, Inc., a domestic stock corporation, to recover preferential payments made by the defendants Theodore S. Holbrook and Edward Schaefer, as officers and directors, to the defendants- Anna M. Schaefer and Frederick M. Vom Saal, creditors, at a time when the corporation was insolvent, against the prohibition of section 66 of the Stock Corporation Law. • The complainant, in substance, alleges that at all the times mentioned therein the defendant Holbrook & Schaefer, Inc., was and is a domestic stock corporation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Southard v. . BennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  3. O'Brien v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. German-American Coffee Co. v. . DiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PostDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Syracuse Television, Inc. v. Channel 9, Syracuse, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rubenstein v. BerchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Woolson Spice Co. v. Columbia Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re Kern's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API