Woolson Spice Co. v. Columbia Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Issues of law raised by the plaintiff; demurrer to the second separate defense set up in the answer of the defendant Columbia Trust Company brought on by the plaintiff as a contested motion, asking for an order sustaining the demurrer, with costs.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The plaintiff has demurred to the sufficiency of the defense set up in the answer of the defendant Columbia Trust Company, as executor of the last will and testament of Herman Sielcken, deceased, which defense is that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and has brought on the issues of law raised by the demurrer as a contested motion, asking for an order sustaining the demurrer, with costs. The separate defense in question does not contain any general or special denial. The complaint alleges that from 1910 to 1915 the said Sielcken was the president and a director of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- German American Coffee Co. v. DiehlNew York Supreme Court · 1914
- Holland v. . GroteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Sherwood v. HolbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- German-American Coffee Co. v. DiehlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- W. B. Cruikshank Building Corp. v. EgbertNew York Supreme Court · 1927