Legal Opinion
Chase v. MacDonell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 1932No. 20707PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
On the 20th day of July, 1928, W. L. Stroud recovered judgment by default against Fred D. MacDonell in the justice of the peace court in the city of Tulsa. Thereafter an execution was issued on the judgment and placed in the hands of Arthur Chase, constable, who levied upon an automobile which belonged to MacDonell. On November 7, 1928, by agreement of the parties, the judgment was vacated and the automobile returned to MacDonell. It was returned in a damaged condition. MacDonell, as plaintiff, then brought this action in the common pleas court of Tulsa county against Arthur Chase, constable,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Inman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- City of Tacoma v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. AckleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- McCorcle v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. J. W. CagleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Minick v. Rhoades Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Alford v. McConnellDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939