Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. J. W. Cagle
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee, sometimes noted as the insured, instituted this action against the appellant insurance company seeking recovery upon a policy of fire insurance issued by the company to him and purporting to provide fire loss protection upon the insured’s personal property to the sum of $3,000 and upon the premises occupied by the insured to the amount of $6,000. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment for $8,000 in favor of the insured. The insurance company now challenges the judgment asserting that appellee had no or, at best, a limited insurable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arkansas Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Dunn v. YakishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Asher v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Des Moines Ins. Co. of Des Moines, Iowa v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Black v. SilverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- W. M. Acree v. Hanover Insurance Company and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, and Donald R. Martin and Joyce Martin, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Continental Oil Co. v. American Quasar Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1977
- John Klukavy, and Theodore Fitzgerald v. United National Insurance Co., Lafayette-Orleans, Inc., Plaintiff- CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988