Legal Opinion

Earnest v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-1806PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

Kenneth Dean Earnest filed an application for postconviction relief claiming that he had been denied effective assistance of counsel during his plea and sentencing proceedings, resulting in an erroneous restitution order. The State moved for summary judgment asserting that the restitution claim was procedurally barred because the district court had ruled on the issue and no appeal had been taken and because restitution claims may not be raised in a postconviction proceeding. The district court granted the State’s motion and dismissed the application for postconviction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Washington v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1992
  4. State v. JanzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. State v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Osborn v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. State of Iowa v. Marc A. HagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State v. RubinoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. State v. ScaliseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. State v. DoggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API