Legal Opinion

State v. Rubino

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1999No. 98-251PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

We granted further review to consider the State’s challenge to a court of appeals decision which reversed defendant’s conviction for first-degree burglary because of counsel’s failure to appear and advocate on his behalf at a “reverse waiver” hearing. See Iowa Code §§ 803.6, 232.8 (1995) (granting district court jurisdiction over juveniles sixteen years or older charged with committing a forcible felony and authorizing transfer to juvenile court in appropriate cases). We agree — and the State concedes — that the defendant, who was just days shy of his eighteenth birthday when…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. State v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Deandre D. Goode v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API