Duncan v. State

OPINION

WOODLEYi Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction for felony theft (Art. 62 P.C.) life.

Two grounds of error are set forth in appellant’s brief.

The first complains that the court committed reversible error in allowing the in-court identification of appellant by the witness Richard Buckel. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1149; Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; and Martinez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 437 S.W.2d 842, are cited.

The indictment alleged the robbery of Richard Buckel.…