Legal Opinion · Dissent

Janelli v. Janelli

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1948No. 14017Published

1DissentYoung, Justice

To, my mind the majority conclusions are without precedent. In the first place, the matters before us involve interlocutory orders made by the trial court during pend-ency of a divorce suit under Art. 4636, Vernon’s Ann.Stats., hence not appealable; and this -Court should have sustained ap-pellee’s motion to dismiss the cause for Want of jurisdiction. The following -excerpt from Beckler v. Beckler, Tex.Civ.App., 114 S.W.2d 618, 619, is illustrative of the consistent holdings of our courts on n-onappealability of such temporary orders as may arise under title 75, eh. 4 on Divorce; the appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Dyer v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Pittman v. ByarsTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Scanlan v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Dakan v. DakanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API