Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1933No. 10018PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The appeal, advanced for hearing under the statute, is from an order below refusing a temporary injunction. What is thought to be a proper statement of all material features in the trial court, whether substantive or procedural, is thus taken from the appellee’s brief:

“On April 29, 1933, appellants, being the owners of a twelve-story office building located in the business district of Houston, Texas, and known as ‘Scanlan Building,’ filed this suit against appellee, the electric company serving electric energy in Houston and environs and serving such building.
“The allegations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillis v. RosenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. E. H. Perry & Co. v. LangbehnTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. English v. ShelbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Inter-City Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Mann v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's CafeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. City of San Antonio v. Heath & Stich, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. International Ass'n of MacHinists Union, Local No. 1488 v. Federated Ass'n of Accessory WorkersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Arvol D. Hays Construction Co. v. R & M Agency Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API