Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1984No. 82-1120PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment made final by entry of a proper Rule 54 (b), ARCP, order. The judgment dismissed counts three and four of the complaint. We affirm.

In count three, Richard G. Stewart sought to recover damages of State Farm Insurance Company on the theory that he was a third party beneficiary of the insurance contract between State Farm and David B. Braddock, also a defendant in this action. That count alleged that he, Stewart, was a third party beneficiary because of his status as a member of the public injured by Braddock's neligent operation of a motor…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Maness v. ALABAMA FARM BUREAU, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Howton v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Strother v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API