Legal Opinion
Fout v. Giraldin
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. P. R. Flitcraft, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
The circuit court held, on demurrer, that the petition in this cause did not state a cause of action. The plaintiffs having declined to amend, final judgment was entered on the demurrer. Omitting the caption, the petition is as follows:
“Come now the plaintiffs, and by leave of court file this, their amended petition, and for cause of action state that defendants are, and at the time hereinafter mentioned were, partners engaged under the name of Giraldin Bros. & Cates, in the city and state aforesaid, *166in the real estate business and in loaning money for themselves and others, and in collecting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claflin v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. WorthingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. BegleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Glass & Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Wilkerson v. HoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.