Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Jones

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Henry Booth, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The single point made, upon which appellant relies for a reversal of the judgment in this case, is, that the damages are excessive.

The action was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by appellee in consequence of a defective sidewalk in the city of Chicago. In passing along on State street, appellee stepped on a broken plank in the sidewalk, and fell and broke her right arm at the wrist, from the effects of which she suffered great pain and was incapacitated from following • her usual occupation, which was that of a nurse and domestic servant, during a period of nine or ten…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. City of Peru v. FrenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seaboard M'f'g. Co. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Townsend v. City of PaolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Morgan v. Illinois & St. L. Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API