Legal Opinion

Townsend v. City of Paola

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

M'ror from Miami District Court. Action to recover damages for personal injuries. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

Mary C. Townsend, the plaintiff in error, filed her petition against the city of Paola, a city of the second class, on the 10th day of February, 1886, in which she demanded a judgment against said city in a large sum, for damages on account of a personal injury she received by falling in a. ditch excavated for the purpose of laying water-*592pipes along one of the streets of said city. She was injured on the night of the 31st day of January, 1886, about the hour of 9 o’clock P. M. Her injuries consisted of a “green-stick fracture” of the smaller ribs; an indentation in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. George v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Malone v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Fulsome v. Town of ConcordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SissonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Edgerton v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  3. Fuqua v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. State v. SissonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API