Legal Opinion

Rusch Factors, Inc. v. Fairview Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered July 23, 1969 staying the action and directing the parties to proceed to arbitration reversed on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, the stay vacated and defendant-respondent’s motion denied. The defendant-respondent Fairview by its conduct evidenced unmistakably the intention to waive arbitration and to litigate the controversy in this action. During the period between the service of the summons and complaint on February 5, 1969 and the joinder of issue by the service of its answer on May 15, 1969, the defendant’s time to answer was repeatedly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Matter of Haupt v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Short v. National Sport Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Johanson Resources, Inc. v. LaValleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Tengtu International Corp. v. Pak Kwan CheungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Hyde v. Jewish Home LifecareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API