Legal Opinion

Gurrobat v. HTH Corporation.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2015No. SCAP-12-0000764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

Following the publication of our opinion in Gurrobat v. HTH Corp., 133 Hawai'i 1, 323 P.3d 792 (2014), Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Raymond Gurrobat (“Gurrobat”), individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, requested that we award him attorneys’ fees and costs for his appeal and cross-appeal, and provide for interest on the judgment. Gurrobat bases his request for fees and costs on Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (“HRAP”) Rule 39 (2007), and on the fee shifting provisions found in Hawaii Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nakamoto v. Kawauchi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API