Gurrobat v. HTH Corporation.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
I. Introduction
Following the publication of our opinion in Gurrobat v. HTH Corp., 133 Hawai'i 1, 323 P.3d 792 (2014), Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Raymond Gurrobat (“Gurrobat”), individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, requested that we award him attorneys’ fees and costs for his appeal and cross-appeal, and provide for interest on the judgment. Gurrobat bases his request for fees and costs on Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (“HRAP”) Rule 39 (2007), and on the fee shifting provisions found in Hawaii Revised Statutes…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nakamoto v. Kawauchi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018