Legal Opinion
Mellon v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 9, 1999No. 96-1454-JTMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
Two motions are currently pending before the court: (1) Cessna’s motion to alter or, alternatively, to amend the judgment; and (2) Mellon’s motion for attorney’s fees and non-taxable expenses. Both motions are fully briefed. The court advised the parties of its decision previously through a telephone conference. For the reasons stated during that conference and as more fully discussed below=, both motions are denied.
I. Cessna’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment
Pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 7.3(a) 1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), Cessna moves the court to alter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John C. Shimman v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerber v. Qwest Group Life Insurance PlanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Ireland v. DodsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Barry Douglas Stead v. B. BirkholzDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Barry Douglas Stead v. B. BirkholzDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Brenner v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Los AlamosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020