Legal Opinion
United States v. Lachman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 26, 2008No. 06-1058, 06-1060, 06-1061PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
This case, arising from defendants’ convictions on charges of violating and conspiring to violate the Export Administration Act of 1979 (“EAA”) and its implementing regulations, is before us for the third time. The facts and earlier procedural history are recounted in United States v. Lachman, 387 F.3d 42, 46-49 (1st Cir.2004) (“Lachman II”); United States v. Lachman, 48 F.3d 586, 588 (1st Cir.1995) (“Lachman /”); and United States v. Lachman, 278 F.Supp.2d 68, 73-74 (D.Mass.2003). We first describe briefly what happened and elaborate where necessary below.
The defendants…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. MarekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- State v. KeenerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. AbdelazizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- Campuzano v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- United States v. Cardona-VicentyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.