Legal Opinion
Faina Oza v. Andrew M. Saul
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05671Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 O 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FAINA O., Case No. 2:19-cv-05671-KES 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. 19 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff Faina O. (“Plaintiff”) applied for Titles II and XVI Social Security 21 disability insurance benefits in 2014 while living alone in New Jersey, alleging a 22 disability onset date of April 5, 2011. Administrative Record (“AR”) 397-404. On 23 March 21, 2017, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.