Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Kennady

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1959No. 8 Div. 405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

The complaint below, as amended, was in one count, and claimed on account stated.

The count was substantially in code form, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer filed thereto.

The defendant (appellant here) filed pleas of the statute of limitations, and of the general issue.

The defendant also filed a motion to transfer the action to the equity side of the court, alleging he had an equitable defense, and that the matters involved in the suit were complex, and necessitated a fair adjudication of mutual accounts.

The action of the court in denying the motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loventhal & Son v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DupreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Snellings v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Bailey v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Yarbrough v. Armour & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Southern Railway Company v. McCamySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Anderson v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Hanson v. KennadySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API