Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Dupree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1931No. 7 Div. 34PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The complaint, in two counts, was for the breach of a bond and a common count in assumpsit.

The motion for the transfer to the equity side of the court to enable the defendant to assert an equitable defense was denied on the ground that such equitable defense in the nature of subrogation could be interposed and tried in the pending action at law. The pleading was in short by consent, as follows: “It is agreed between the parties in the above-captioned case, that the defendant may plead in short by consent all defenses appropriate to the causes of action stated in the several counts of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Sealy v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Lehman-Hoge & ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API