Legal Opinion

Griffin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1994No. A93A1858, A93A1859, A93A1860, A93A1861, A93A1862, A93A1863, A93A1864, A93A1865, A93A1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The State of Georgia brought these proceedings to condemn approximately $20,000 in cash. The money was seized from the appellants in a gambling raid. The trial court determined that the money should be condemned. These appeals followed. Held:

1. Appellants assert the trial court should have dismissed the condemnation petitions because they recited that the State was proceeding under the controlled substances forfeiture statute (OCGA § 16-13-49), instead of the gambling forfeiture statute (OCGA § 16-12-32). We disagree. The petitions clearly stated that the currency…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Izzo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Bloodworth v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Brown v. RockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. State v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bettis v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Woods v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Mayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API