Dailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MORRISON, Presiding Judge., The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 3 years.,
Our State’s Attorney confesses error. The verdict was returned by a jury consisting of only eleven jurors. A verdict of less than twelve jurors will not support a valid judgment. , Clark v. St,ate, Tex.Cr. App., 276 S.W.2d 819, and cases there cited.
Appellant urges,, however, that we write on the question of former jeopardy which she contends' was raised. Though the record is far from Complete on the question, we do observe that there was no final judgment in the prior case because notice of appeal was given…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte LittleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Cuellar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Hanley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Marr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985
- Cuellar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.