Legal Opinion

Atwater v. Matanuska Elec. Ass'n, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1986No. S-890, S-891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to interpret the indemnity provision of the Alaska health and safety statutes regulating activities near high voltage lines. Jack Atwater was electrocuted when he came in contact with a 7200 volt line while working on the roof of a motel owned by him and his family. Galen Atwater, as administrator of Jack’s estate, sued Matanuska Electric Association (MEA) for wrongful death. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the estate on the issue of MEA’s negligence. MEA then filed a third-party complaint against the Atwater…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Butaud v. Suburban Marine & Sporting Goods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. GordonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Anchorage Municipal Employees Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Maine Power Company v. Devereux Marine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  4. Homer Electric Ass'n v. TowsleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Homer Electric Ass'n v. TowsleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API