Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Harden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1957No. 36840PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

The automobile was placed in the hands of the defendant by the plaintiff and carried the relationship of bailor and bailee. Ordinary care was required of the bailee. The evidence shows that the bailor left the automobile with the bailee and gave specific instructions to the bailee as to the place and manner of parking the automobile, which instructions had been followed for many months with the full knowledge of the bailor. The automobile was left unlocked with the key in the switch in front of other automobiles, thus placing the automobile in front of the filling station in a place tempting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. DavieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Richter Bros. v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Elliott v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Walker Electrical Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Woods v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Atlanta Recycled Fiber Co. v. Tri-Cities Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Ford Motor Company v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API