Legal Opinion
In re Panaggio
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 7, 2019No. 2017-0469Published
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The petitioner, Andrew Panaggio, appeals a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board). The board denied his request for reimbursement from the respondent, CNA Insurance Company (insurance carrier), for the cost incurred for therapeutic cannabis authorized pursuant to RSA chapter 126-X, to treat his work-related injury.1 We reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand.
*1101The record supports the following facts. Panaggio suffered a work-related injury to his lower back in 1991. A permanent impairment award was approved in 1996, and in 1997 he received a lump-sum settlement.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Steve McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. William F. Dolt, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Rodriguez-DuranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.