Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Flores

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 2007PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

Case History: Flores I

¶ 1 This direct appeal has returned to us after we remanded it for the filing of a proper concise statement of matters complained of on appeal, commonly known as a 1925(b) statement. See Commonwealth v. Flores, 909 A.2d 387, 392 (Pa.Super.2006) (Flores I); Pa.R.A.P.1925(b). When we first considered this matter, before remand, Appellant’s attorney had filed a petition to withdraw as counsel, alleging that the appeal was frivolous. Counsel had also filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. GarangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. FeuchtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. TyackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API