Commonwealth v. Flores
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
COLVILLE, J.:
Case History: Flores I
¶ 1 This direct appeal has returned to us after we remanded it for the filing of a proper concise statement of matters complained of on appeal, commonly known as a 1925(b) statement. See Commonwealth v. Flores, 909 A.2d 387, 392 (Pa.Super.2006) (Flores I); Pa.R.A.P.1925(b). When we first considered this matter, before remand, Appellant’s attorney had filed a petition to withdraw as counsel, alleging that the appeal was frivolous. Counsel had also filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. GarangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. FeuchtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. TyackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.