Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Young

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The defendant Young, though a member of the school board, had nothing to do with the plaintiff's dismissal, being absent from the meeting at which' the subject was considered and action taken. No argument has been made and no reason is suggested for his liability. The directed verdict in his favor must stand.

Regarding the liability of the members of the board who took part and acted, the principle that “All judicial officers, when acting on subjects within their jurisdiction, are exempted from civil prosecution for their acts” (Evans v. Foster, 1 N. H. 374, 377) has been generally extended in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Arthur N. Economou v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Belcher v. PaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Everitt v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. Tilton v. DoughertySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API