Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Social Services v. Pedro M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. PaigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Shandeia McM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re Commissioner of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998