Budzinski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
These two suits by the plaintiffs as beneficiaries under life insurance policies issued by the respective defendants, presenting the same questions of law, were consolidated for trial and have been considered together on this appeal from a denial of reserved motions for directed verdicts and motions for new trials.
The facts are not in dispute. Defendants have paid the life insurance benefits under the policies and the suits were instituted to recover payment under the accidental death provisions contained therein. One policy insured against death resulting, “directly and independently of all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Lickleider v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Kangas v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Kerns v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Moon v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Valente v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Bristol v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Scharmer v. Occidental Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.