Legal Opinion
Eason Oil Co. v. Neal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1933No. 24656PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(OSBORN, J.
This is an original action to review an award of the State industrial Commission in favor of claimant, J. P. Neal, against petitioner, Eason Oil Company.
Claimant was employed by the petitioner as a switcher on one of its oil leases near Oklahoma City, and on January 21, 1933, between the hours of $ :0O and 10:00 o’clock p. m., claimant was injured as a result of an altercation with two members of the state militia. The nature of the injury was a fractured skull. The award was for temporary total disability.
The sole contention of petitioner is that the injury did not arise out of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Claim of Verschleiser v. Joseph Stern & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Mullins v. TankslearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReinholtzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- B & B NURSING HOME v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Burrell v. PrewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.