Legal Opinion

Furman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1956No. 191-55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JoNES, OMef Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, a purchaser from the Government of surplus textiles, alleges a breach of contract by the defendant.

According to the allegations in the petition, the Philadelphia Quartermaster Depot on June 29, 1954, asked for bids on certain surplus property described in the invitation.

The invitation to bid listed the property as government surplus. It listed other items not relevant here, but each invitation which was sent to plaintiff along with other prospective bidders contained the following:

*203ALL ITEMS TO BE SOLD £<AS is” “WHERE is” ON GROSS…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Sanitary Rag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Alloys & Chemicals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. American Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Alloys and Chemicals Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API