Legal Opinion

Duval v. Howe

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 22, 2005No. 050879APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Agnes, Peter W., J.

Background

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on grounds that it does not state a claim for relief. See Mass.RCiv.P. 12(b)(6). This requires the court to assume the truth of the allegations as set forth in plaintiffs complaint. The essential facts are as follows.

On April 18,2004, the plaintiff, Cynthia Duval, was legally upon the premises of the defendant for the purpose of caring for and riding her horse that she, for a fee, boarded at the premises. At that time, an aggressive horse owned by the defendants was permitted to enter an area in which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Steege v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Town of Sturbridge v. McDowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Konan v. GeorgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API