Barfield v. Aiken
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Only the 7th headnote requires any elaboration. We fully recognize the well-settled rule that in the construction of wills the courts should look to that- interpretation which carries out the provisions of the statute of distribution, rather than that which defeats them; that, in the absence of anything in the will to the contrary, the presumption is that the ancestor intended that his property should go where the la,w carries it, which is supposed to be the channel of natural descent; and that the use of such terms as “in equal shares,”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wright v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Maclean v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Snellings v. DownerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Fraser v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Mayer v. HoverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brewton v. McLeodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Lewis v. Van AndaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Butts v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Brown v. CronicSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Hinson v. HinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.