Legal Opinion
Maples v. Solarwinds, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 23, 2014No. Case No: C 12-6066 SBAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Dkt. 43
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge
This is a diversity jurisdiction action brought by Plaintiff Mike Maples (“Plaintiff’ or “Maples”), who alleges that Defendant SolarWinds, Inc. (“Defendant” or “SolarWinds”) is refusing to allow him to exercise his stock options in violation of their written agreements. The parties are presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. Dkt. 43. Having read and considered the papers…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SILICON VALLEY BANK v. SAGGIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021