Legal Opinion
Kirkbride v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 4, 1988No. C-88-2932 JPVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT
VUKASIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Third party defendant Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”) removed this case to this Court pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1730(k)(l)(C). The Kirkbrides and Wong, plaintiffs and counter-defendants (“plaintiffs”), moved this Court to remand. This Court remands the action because 1) it is not clear that the FSLIC was named in its corporate capacity, and 2) this case involves important matters of state interest, including issues of first impression.
II. FACTS
This matter is one of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Kevin Naylor v. Case and McGrath Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Corcoran v. Ardra Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ecodyne Corp. v. ShahDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Kirkbride v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kirkbride v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Bruce Kirkbride v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991