Legal Opinion

Wood v. Ordway

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1909Published

Motion by plaintiff for judgment upon the answer as frivolous.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

The facts upon which this motion rests were admitted by counsel upon the argument and are also set forth in their briefs. The complaint was served personally on the 21st day of January, 1909. T'he answer was served on February 9, 1909, by mail. An amended answer was served by mail March 18, 1909, thirty-seven days after the mailing of the original answer. On March 19, 1909, the plaintiff returned the amended answer indorsing the same “ blot served in time.” On the 21st of March, 1909, the plaintiff moved for judgment.

*182It was contended by the plaintiff that the answer, although served by mail,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Schlesinger v. Borough BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Schlegel v. Roman Catholic Church of the Most Holy TrinityNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Seckel v. TangemannNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API