Seckel v. Tangemann

This action was brought to recover $1694.76 as balance due for goods sold and delivered. The summons and complaint were served September 25, 1906, and the answer was served by mail October 1, 1906. An amended answer was served by mail October 11, 1906; but the plaintiffs returned the amended answer as not having been served in time (six days). The defendant made a motion to coim pel plaintiffs to accept the amended answer, upon the ground that her service of the original answer by mail gave her double time to serve an amended answer. This motion was denied and the order was affirmed, without…