Legal Opinion

Tarsney v. Wayne Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus by Timothy E. Tarsney to compel Harry A. Lockwood, acting circuit judge of Wayne county, to vacate an order setting a cause for trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The statute provides that one who would avail himself of the right to an examination of witnesses in open court, in a chancery case, must serve upon his adversary’s counsel a notice of such intention, within 10 days after the cause is at issue, and that failing to do this, the cause shall stand referred to a commissioner to take proofs, etc. 3 Comp. Laws, § 10188.

Such a notice was not served in this cause, but the parties stipulated that the hearing of a then pending demurrer should be adjourned to August 19, 1907, and that in the event of the demurrer being overruled, and the order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Cosgrove v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Geddis v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Sharp v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lake Angelo Associates v. Township of White LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Zemon v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kellogg v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API