Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Patillo

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1948No. 6 Div. 585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The appeal record in this case is incomplete. On this account, we are precluded from reviewing many of the questions presented by assignments of error and insisted upon in brief of counsel.

The original complaint contains two counts. There appear a motion to dismiss the cause of action and a motion to strike the motion to dismiss. Apparently, the court made no ruling on either of these, if so it is not shown in the record.

To the original complaint the defendant filed what he denotes “Plea in Bar,” which is stated in form of demurrers. Plaintiff’s demurrers thereto were correctly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Lakey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Kansas City M. & B. R. R. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dillard v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  2. Gregg v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API