Legal Opinion

Prasch v. Prasch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

There is no serious or irreconcilable conflict in the evidence. At the time of the accident plaintiff was the fiancée of defendant, and knew that he was an experienced driver and usually drove at from twenty-five to thirty miles per hour on city streets, under ordinary conditions. Plaintiff was injured by the tipping over of the automobile which defendant was driving on a city street and in which plaintiff and another couple were riding as defendant’s *355guests. For several miles defendant had been driving at about twenty miles per hour. About a block before the accident the pavement began to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. SutliffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hamus v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reykdal v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hartzheim v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bump v. VoightsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API