Legal Opinion
Pantaze v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1932No. 6274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Charles D. Pantaze, sought to prove a claim of $3,304.23 against the estate of the Nugrape Bottling Company, a bankrupt, based on certain notes of the bankrupt secured by a chattel mortgage. On opposition by the trustee, the claim was disallowed and expunged by the referee. On review by the District Court, the ruling of the referee was affirmed.
The record is not as satisfactory as it might be, but it supports the following conclusions as to the material facts: The bankrupt, a Texas corporation, was engaged in the bottling business at Dallas, and Pantaze owned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- W. C. Bowman Lumber Co. v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Carter v. BogdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knox v. First Security Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Southern United Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Standard Oil Co. v. CadwaladerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- In the Matter of John Rich Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtors-Appellee. Emanuel Fields, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Knox v. First Security Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952