Legal Opinion
Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Westhall Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 30, 1976No. C 73-1150PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
The above-styled ease is brought by plaintiff to remedy what it alleges has been unfair competition and trademark infringement by the defendant. Plaintiff contends that it has a valid mark, that being “Jewel,” which has been improperly used by defendant in its operation of retail stores, which are known as “Jewel Mart” Stores. The claims made by plaintiff arise under the federal trademark and unfair competition laws (15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.), under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Ohio Revised Code § 4165.02), and under the common…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The J. B. Williams Company, Inc. v. Le Conte Cosmetics, Inc., and Elton C. Toland and Lenore TolandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc. v. Milsan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Cesare v. WorkOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Waples-Platter Companies v. General Foods Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.