Legal Opinion

Stanich v. Canal Entertainment

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2009No. 2009-CA-0707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge.

[, Canal Entertainment, and its workers’ compensation carrier, American International Group Claim Service, Inc., (“defendants”) appeal the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”), finding that Michael Stanich did not commit fraud in violation of La.Rev.Stat. 23:1208, and further finding that defendants are not entitled to an offset or credit pursuant to La.Rev.Stat. 23:1225. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Relevant Facts

On April 15, 2003, Mr. Stanich injured his back, hip, and elbow in the course and scope of his employment with Canal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Cousins v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Hernandez v. Eskco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Ocon v. Regency Motors of Metairie, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Harrah'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. State, Office of Risk Management, Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Spence v. Excelsior Endeavors & Development, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. State, Off of Risk Mgmt, La. dept.of Trans. & Develop. v. Patrick RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API