Legal Opinion

Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2010No. 2010-CA-0818PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES F. McKAY, III, Judge.

| plaintiff, Johnny Bell, Jr., appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation, finding that back surgery was not medically necessary for the injuries sustained in his work-related accident, denying his claim for indemnity benefits, and denying his claim for penalties and attorneys’ fees. Defendant, Mid City Printers, Inc., answers this appeal, asserting that the workers’ compensation judge (“WCJ”) erred in failing to find that Mr. Bell willfully made false statements for the purpose of obtaining benefits. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

STATEM…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. Authement v. Shappert EngineeringSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baker v. Harrah'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Hahn v. X-Cel Air Conditioning, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Hall v. Macpapers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Green v. Allied Building Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Avenue Surgical Suites v. Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API