Macnevin v. Macnevin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the late District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, city and county of San Francisco, vacating certain orders granting alimony and counsel fees. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
This was an action for divorce. Pending proceedings in the case, the court below from time to time made orders requiring the defendant to pay to the plaintiff several sums of money for alimony and counsel fees. Those orders were made enforcible by executions, but they were never enforced, and the court after it had heard the cause upon the merits decided in favor of the defendant; and on the 22d of January, 1879, ordered “that plaintiff’s prayer for a decree of divorce be denied, and that defendant have judgment for costs.” After the making of this order, on motion of defendant’s counsel all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoole v. KinkeadNevada Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Mace v. O'ReilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Neblett v. NeblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carpenter v. Golden State Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Crane v. First National Bank of McHenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.