Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1993No. 1993-0835PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals correctly dismissed the petition in this case and its judgment is affirmed.

The appellant raises the same three issues on appeal that he raised below. However, that court correctly concluded that habeas corpus was unavailable to review allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, Ellis v. McMackin (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 161, 602 N.E.2d 611; the credibility of evidence used at trial, Saulsbury v. Green (1964), 175 Ohio St. 433, 25 O.O.2d 445, 195 N.E.2d 787; and the sufficiency of an indictment, Chapman v. Jago (1976), 48 Ohio St.2d 51, 2 O.O.3d 167, 356 N.E.2d 721.

On appeal,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Chapman v. JagoOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ellis v. McMackinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Northwest Ohio Bar Ass'n v. NobleOhio Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Luna v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. CragoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Williamson v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Luna v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API