Legal Opinion

Ellis v. McMackin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. 92-728PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals reached the correct decision in dismissing appellant’s claim as not jurisdictional. Appellant’s first four issues deal with evidence either used at trial, not used at trial, or allegedly fraudulently used at trial. Regardless, “this is not a ground for relief by habeas corpus, as questions of evidence must be raised by appeal.” Saulsbury v. Green (1964), 175 Ohio St. 433, 434, 25 O.O.2d 445, 195 N.E.2d 787, 788.

Appellant’s next issue is ineffectiveness of counsel. Again this is an issue to be appealed. “[Tjhere is nothing in the record to indicate any lack of competence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hattie v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. May (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In re ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wilson v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Gibson v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API