Pennington v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.
In July, 1921, the plaintiff-appellee and the defendant-appellant, together with eight other men, organized a copartnership at Castana, Iowa, for t1i~ purpose of "buying and selling notes, bonds, mortgages, and other securities. " These eopartners were officers and directors of the Farmers Trust & Savings Bank in said town. Therefore, the reason for enter ing into the partnership venture was to relieve the bank of questionable, and make provision for excessive, loans. Written articles of copartnership were entered into by the parties aforesaid. Of this document, Article Four reads as follows:
“…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smouse v. Waterloo Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- State Savings Bank v. MarkworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- First National Bank v. HolleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hirtz v. KoppesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931