State Savings Bank v. Markworth
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
In the early part of the year 1921, Lundgren Bros, were indebted to appellant in various amounts, partly secured by chattel mortgages, and other indebtedness unsecured, Some of these obligations were due,- and they wanted to borrow more money from the bank, The bank refused to extend further credit to them without a signer on the note with them.' They informed the bank that they could not or would not ask anyone to sign notes with' them. The cashier suggested that possibly someone would be willing to sign with them, and asked whether they had any objections to his procuring a signer to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodbury v. GlickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- National Citizens Bank v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Preston v. GouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Smouse v. Waterloo Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- First National Bank v. HolleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Hess v. GowerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Citizens National Bank v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Markworth v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Pennington v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929